My Mum
has a tiny doll in a tiny antique pram which weighs not much more than a
feather. Even as a child it felt fragile to me. A not to be played with toy.
There
were other dolls from Mum’s childhood that became part of the doll family I had
as a child. Darrell (who I renamed Carol) and Josephine, who had been her
younger sister’s doll. These two were composition dolls manufactured by a mixture
of glue with sawdust which was heavier and denser than papier mâché and easily
molded. They had hollow bodies and moveable limbs and head thanks to some
contraption inside the body which seemed like rubber or elastic bands and
hooks. Their facial features and hair were painted, and they both had eyes that
opened and closed if you laid them down to sleep. Josephine was a taller doll
and could stand up – if you balanced her feet correctly. Being wood based they
were susceptible to damage from moisture though.
This
other even smaller and more fragile doll was made of celluloid and first
belonged to Auntie Hilda, the youngest sister of Mum’s father.
Celluloid
was first created in 1863 and is one of the first synthetic plastics created from
wood products that included camphor and cellulose nitrate. Doll makers began
experimenting as early as the 1870s. By the early 1900s celluloid dolls were
plentiful. Earlier dolls were breakable and fragile made from china and bisque.
Celluloid although inexpensive is flammable, so not perfect, and one would
imagine there could have been tears with open fires and coal range stoves.
Dolls continued to be molded with celluloid as late as the 1950s though the
majority were made between 1900-1940.
Hilda,
my great aunt, was born in Christchurch, New Zealand in the summer of 1914. She
was the youngest child with four older siblings. They lived in Middleton Road
on a 3 acre block which was part of the original Wharenui settlement. Her
father worked for the railways and her mother, most likely assisted by the children,
tended the land and home. They had an orchard with fruit trees and rows upon
rows of raspberries as well as other vegetables and a cow which supplied milk
and butter. I am sure they probably had chooks too.
In my
quest to build knowledge of the lives of our forebears, to keep their memories alive,
I often search digitised newspapers for snippets about them and clues about
their day-to-day life. Recently, while searching to see what I might be able to
glean about school life and other social activities of my grandfather and his siblings
I came across a couple of pieces of information that seemed connected to the
little doll as well.
I had
not ever really thought about her doll and the history attached to it, other
than that it had belonged to her in a bygone era. I don’t know if it had a name
and it is so fragile, I can’t imagine it was ever played with as we, or our
children play with dolls in more recent times. Hilda like most young girls in
her generation and earlier generations was a knitter and a seamstress. Like her
contemporaries she will have learned these skills from her mother from a very
young age.
Prize List, Needlework, Winter Show and Exhibition 1930 from Press, Monday 11 August 1930, page 17.
Hilda
would have been about 16 at this time, was the doll bought just to be a model
for her handiwork? Or was it a treasured childhood toy? I knew that when given
to Mum the doll was dressed in clothes which may have been made by Hilda or
perhaps her sister or mother. But I hadn’t given it much more thought than
that. Now though? Was she wearing those items that had won Hilda the prize? Is
that why she had been kept all these years?
Two entries from secondary school students for Hand-knitted baby's jacket; first prize to Hilda (perhaps made for her nephew). Three entries for Most useful article; Very Highly Commended to Hilda (I wonder what it was) and three entries for Best dressed doll; first prize to Hilda.
Can you
imagine sewing or knitting these tiny items in a room unlit by electricity? The
detail is incredible, smocking, stitched lace, embroidery. The knitting (feather
and fan on the cape) must have been at least 2 ply on needles the size of toothpicks!
These
days, although she still wears her original undergarments and booties, she has
a new cape and bonnet knitted by Mum and a dress knitted in feather and fan
found at a craft market or fair. Her original dress, cape and bonnet are showing
a little wear and have been carefully packed away to save further damage. Some of the ribbon ties have not survived the close to 100 years. Recently she made a trip back to her hometown of Christchurch and spent a few
days being tenderly restored so that her limbs were no longer loose. Maybe with
a little luck she will be cherished for another hundred or so years perhaps
within the family, perhaps in a museum collection.